Legislature(1995 - 1996)
1996-05-02 Senate Journal
Full Journal pdf1996-05-02 Senate Journal Page 3803 HB 158 Senator Miller requested that the reconsideration on SENATE CS FOR CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 158(RLS) am S An Act relating to civil actions; amending Rules 13(e), 68, 79(b), 82(b), and 95, Alaska Rules of Civil Procedure be taken up. SENATE CS FOR CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 158(RLS) am S was before the Senate on reconsideration. Senator Phillips moved that the bill be returned to second reading for the purpose of a specific amendment, that being Amendment No. 9. Without objection, the bill was returned to second reading. Senator Phillips offered Amendment No. 9 : Page 16, line 28: Delete Section 30 Senator Phillips moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 9. Objections were heard. The question being: Shall Amendment No. 9 be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: SCS CSHB 158(RLS) am S Second Reading Amendment No. 9 YEAS: 8 NAYS: 12 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Donley, Ellis, Leman, R.Phillips, Rieger, Sharp, Taylor Nays: Duncan, Frank, Green, Halford, Hoffman, Kelly, Lincoln, Miller, Pearce, Salo, Torgerson, Zharoff and so, Amendment No. 9 failed. SENATE CS FOR CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 158(RLS) am S was automatically in third reading. 1996-05-02 Senate Journal Page 3804 HB 158 The question to be reconsidered: Shall SENATE CS FOR CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 158(RLS) am S An Act relating to civil actions; amending Rules 13(e), 68, 79(b), 82(b), and 95, Alaska Rules of Civil Procedure pass the Senate? The roll was taken with the following result: SCS CSHB 158(RLS) am S Third Reading - On Reconsideration YEAS: 12 NAYS: 8 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Frank, Green, Halford, Kelly, Leman, Miller, Pearce, R.Phillips, Rieger, Sharp, Torgerson, Zharoff Nays: Adams, Donley, Duncan, Ellis, Hoffman, Lincoln, Salo, Taylor and so, SENATE CS FOR CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 158(RLS) am S passed the Senate on reconsideration. Senator Halford moved for the adoption of the Court Rule changes. The question being: Shall the Court Rule changes be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: SCS CSHB 158(RLS) am S Adopt Court Rules? YEAS: 12 NAYS: 8 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Frank, Green, Halford, Kelly, Leman, Miller, Pearce, R.Phillips, Rieger, Sharp, Torgerson, Zharoff Nays: Adams, Donley, Duncan, Ellis, Hoffman, Lincoln, Salo, Taylor and so, the Court Rule changes failed and SENATE CS FOR CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 158(RLS) am S(ct rls fld S) was referred to the Secretary for engrossment.